Why Investment Fees Matter (and How to Keep Them Under Control)

When it comes to investing, we tend to focus on the "big picture" — portfolio growth, asset allocation, and long-term returns.

But sometimes it's the small things that have the biggest impact over time. Investment fees are a perfect example.

If you're not paying close attention to the costs inside your portfolio, you might be giving up more of your returns than you realize.

In this article, we'll break down the types of investment fees, why they matter more than many people think, and how to keep them from quietly eroding your wealth.

Understanding the Different Types of Investment Fees

Fees come in many forms. Here's a simple breakdown:

1. Fund Management Fees (Expense Ratios)

If you invest in mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs), you pay an annual fee known as an expense ratio. This covers operational costs — like paying fund managers, analysts, and administrative support.

• Actively managed funds typically charge higher expense ratios (often 0.5%–1.5% or more).

• Passively managed funds (like index funds) usually have lower costs (sometimes as low as 0.03%–0.10%).

Example: If you invest $1 million in a fund with a 1% expense ratio, you pay $10,000 per year — regardless of whether the fund gains or loses value.

2. Financial Advisory Fees

If you work with a financial advisor, you may pay:

• Assets under management (AUM) fee: Typically 0.5%–1.5% of managed assets annually.

• Flat fees or hourly rates: Some advisors charge based on services provided, not portfolio size.

Working with an advisor who provides true planning and advice may justify these fees — but understanding exactly what you’re paying for is critical.

3. Trading Costs

Every time you buy or sell an investment, you could face:

• Brokerage commissions (though many platforms now offer commission-free trading).

• Bid-ask spreads (the difference between what buyers pay and sellers receive).

For frequent traders or less liquid investments, trading costs can add up.

4. Embedded Product Fees

Certain products, like annuities or alternative investments, may carry:

• Mortality and expense charges

• Administrative fees

• Sub-account investment fees

It’s important to review the full cost structure of these products — not just the headline features.

Why Investment Fees Matter So Much

You might think a 1% or 2% fee sounds small. But over time, those small percentages can have a big compounding effect — in the wrong direction.

Consider this example:

• $1,000,000 portfolio

• 6% average annual return before fees

• 1.5% total annual fees

• 20-year time horizon

Without fees: Portfolio grows to ~$3.21 million. With 1.5% fees: Portfolio grows to only ~$2.48 million.

Difference: You give up over $730,000 — due to fees alone.

Even if actual market returns vary, the core lesson remains: High fees silently reduce the compounding power of your investments.

How to Keep Investment Fees Under Control

Fortunately, being proactive about fees doesn't mean sacrificing quality. It’s about balancing cost with value.

Here are some ways to stay fee-efficient:

1. Use Low-Cost, Index-Based Funds When Appropriate

Many investors benefit from adding low-cost index funds or ETFs to their portfolios. They offer broad market exposure at a fraction of the cost of actively managed funds.

Tip: Always compare the expense ratio of any fund you consider. Even small differences add up over time.

2. Work with Transparent Advisors

If you pay an advisory fee, ensure you:

• Know exactly how much you’re paying.

• Understand what services are included (e.g., financial planning, tax strategies, estate planning).

A higher advisory fee can be justified when it accompanies comprehensive planning services — but clarity is key.

Look for advisors who always put your goals first. A simple test to verify this is if the advisor asks a wide variety of questions before making any kind of recommendation.Additionally - getting a lot of recommendations in the first meeting can be a red flag. It takes time for an advisor to really create a plan and think about all pros and cons. 

3. Review Investment Products Carefully

Be cautious with:

• High-cost mutual funds

• Annuities with layered fees

• Private placements or complex structures

These products can serve a purpose in certain strategies, but they need to be evaluated through a cost-benefit lens.

Always ask: "What am I paying — and what am I receiving in return?"

4. Consolidate Accounts When Appropriate

Managing multiple scattered accounts (especially with different providers) can lead to redundant fees and missed opportunities to optimize costs.

By consolidating where appropriate, you may:

• Negotiate lower fees at higher asset levels

• Simplify management

• Improve oversight and tax efficiency

5. Regularly Audit Your Portfolio

Set a reminder at least once a year to review:

• Fund expense ratios

• Trading activity and costs

• Advisory fees

• Embedded product costs

Being intentional — even once a year — can result in meaningful savings over decades.

Final Thoughts: It's Not Just About "Cheap" — It's About Smart Costs

The goal isn’t to chase the lowest fees at all costs. It’s about value — ensuring every dollar you pay is working toward your broader financial success.

High costs are sometimes justified by strong, consistent planning or access to specialized investment opportunities. But silent, unnecessary fees? Those should be addressed.

At Kingdom Guard Financial Group, we help clients create portfolios that are both cost-conscious and aligned with their personal goals — because preserving your wealth is just as important as growing it.

Important Disclosure: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered individualized investment, tax, or legal advice. Consult with your financial professional before making any investment decisions.

The use of asset allocation or diversification does not assure a profit or guarantee against a loss. Investing involves risk which includes potential loss of principal. All numeric examples and any individuals shown are hypothetical and were used for explanatory purposes only. Actual results may vary.